Aug 2026 · 6 min read
Zero-code integrations with the Factory and Strategy patterns
Every new third-party integration used to mean new mapping code. A metadata-driven engine turned it into configuration and saved about 40 hours a month.
An integration platform talks to many external APIs. Each one wants requests in its own shape and answers in its own shape. When every integration has hand-written mapping code, adding one takes days and every change risks breaking another.
Separate what changes from what doesn't
The flow is always the same: build a request, call the API, map the response. Only the mapping differs. That is exactly what the Strategy pattern is for.
public interface MappingStrategy {
ExternalRequest toRequest(Order order, MappingConfig config);
Result fromResponse(ExternalResponse response, MappingConfig config);
}Let metadata choose the strategy
A Factory reads the integration's metadata (format, field mappings, auth type) and returns the right strategy. Most integrations share a generic, configuration-driven strategy, and only unusual ones need a custom class.
public class MappingStrategyFactory {
private final Map<String, MappingStrategy> custom;
private final MappingStrategy generic;
public MappingStrategy forIntegration(MappingConfig config) {
return custom.getOrDefault(config.integrationId(), generic);
}
}SOLID in practice
- Open/closed: new integrations add configuration, not edits to existing code
- Single responsibility: calling an API and mapping its data are separate concerns
- Dependency inversion: the workflow depends on MappingStrategy, not on concrete integrations
Result
Onboarding a standard integration became a configuration task. That removed about 40 hours a month of manual configuration work, and it later made it possible to have AI agents generate the configuration from API specs.